lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bef9fc2c-c982-4b46-b16a-8ecbc9584d62@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 12:23:12 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>, will@...nel.org, aneesh.kumar@...nel.org,
 npiggin@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, dev.jain@....com,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ioworker0@...il.com, linmag7@...il.com
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] mm: make PT_RECLAIM depends on
 MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE

On 12/17/25 10:45, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> 
> The PT_RECLAIM can work on all architectures that support
> MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE, so make PT_RECLAIM depends on
> MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.
> 
> BTW, change PT_RECLAIM to be enabled by default, since nobody should want
> to turn it off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
>   mm/Kconfig       | 9 ++-------
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 80527299f859a..0d22da56a71b0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -331,7 +331,6 @@ config X86
>   	select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
>   	imply IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT    if EFI
>   	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE
> -	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM		if X86_64
>   	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT		if SMP
>   	select SCHED_SMT			if SMP
>   	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER	if SMP
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index bd0ea5454af82..fc00b429b7129 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -1447,14 +1447,9 @@ config ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
>   	  The architecture has hardware support for userspace shadow call
>             stacks (eg, x86 CET, arm64 GCS or RISC-V Zicfiss).
>   
> -config ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM
> -	def_bool n
> -
>   config PT_RECLAIM
> -	bool "reclaim empty user page table pages"
> -	default y
> -	depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM && MMU && SMP
> -	select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>   	help
>   	  Try to reclaim empty user page table pages in paths other than munmap
>   	  and exit_mmap path.

This patch seems to make s390x compilations sometimes unhappy:

Unverified Warning (likely false positive, kindly check if interested):

     mm/memory.c:1911 zap_pte_range() error: uninitialized symbol 'pmdval'.

Warning ids grouped by kconfigs:

recent_errors
`-- s390-randconfig-r072-20260117
     `-- mm-memory.c-zap_pte_range()-error:uninitialized-symbol-pmdval-.

I assume the compiler is not able to figure out that only when
try_get_and_clear_pmd() returns false that pmdval could be uninitialized.

Maybe it has to do with LTO?


After all, that function resides in a different compilation unit.

Which makes me wonder whether we want to just move try_get_and_clear_pmd()
and reclaim_pt_is_enabled() to internal.h or even just memory.c?

But then, maybe we could remove pt_reclaim.c completely and just have
try_to_free_pte() in memory.c as well?


I would just do the following cleanup:

 From cfe97092f71fcc88f729f07ee0bc6816e3e398f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 12:20:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: move pte table reclaim code to memory.c

Let's move the code and clean it up a bit along the way.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org>
---
  MAINTAINERS     |  1 -
  mm/internal.h   | 18 -------------
  mm/memory.c     | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  mm/pt_reclaim.c | 72 -------------------------------------------------
  4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 mm/pt_reclaim.c

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 11720728d92f2..28e8e28bca3e5 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -16692,7 +16692,6 @@ R:	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
  R:	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
  L:	linux-mm@...ck.org
  S:	Maintained
-F:	mm/pt_reclaim.c
  F:	mm/vmscan.c
  F:	mm/workingset.c
  
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 9508dbaf47cd4..ef71a1d9991f2 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -1745,24 +1745,6 @@ int walk_page_range_debug(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
  			  unsigned long end, const struct mm_walk_ops *ops,
  			  pgd_t *pgd, void *private);
  
-/* pt_reclaim.c */
-bool try_get_and_clear_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t *pmdval);
-void free_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, struct mmu_gather *tlb,
-	      pmd_t pmdval);
-void try_to_free_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
-		     struct mmu_gather *tlb);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM
-bool reclaim_pt_is_enabled(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
-			   struct zap_details *details);
-#else
-static inline bool reclaim_pt_is_enabled(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
-					 struct zap_details *details)
-{
-	return false;
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM */
-
  void dup_mm_exe_file(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm);
  int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm);
  
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index f2e9e05388743..a09226761a07f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1824,11 +1824,68 @@ static inline int do_zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
  	return nr;
  }
  
+static bool pte_table_reclaim_enabled(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+		struct zap_details *details)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM))
+		return false;
+	return details && details->reclaim_pt && (end - start >= PMD_SIZE);
+}
+
+static bool zap_empty_pte_table(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t *pmdval)
+{
+	spinlock_t *pml = pmd_lockptr(mm, pmd);
+
+	if (!spin_trylock(pml))
+		return false;
+
+	*pmdval = pmdp_get_lockless(pmd);
+	pmd_clear(pmd);
+	spin_unlock(pml);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool zap_pte_table_if_empty(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
+		unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdval)
+{
+	spinlock_t *pml, *ptl = NULL;
+	pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
+	int i;
+
+	pml = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
+	start_pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(mm, pmd, addr, pmdval, &ptl);
+	if (!start_pte)
+		goto out_ptl;
+	if (ptl != pml)
+		spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
+	for (i = 0, pte = start_pte; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, pte++) {
+		if (!pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))
+			goto out_ptl;
+	}
+	pte_unmap(start_pte);
+
+	pmd_clear(pmd);
+
+	if (ptl != pml)
+		spin_unlock(ptl);
+	spin_unlock(pml);
+	return true;
+out_ptl:
+	if (start_pte)
+		pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);
+	if (ptl != pml)
+		spin_unlock(pml);
+	return false;
+}
+
  static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
  				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
  				unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
  				struct zap_details *details)
  {
+	bool can_reclaim_pt = pte_table_reclaim_enabled(addr, end, details);
  	bool force_flush = false, force_break = false;
  	struct mm_struct *mm = tlb->mm;
  	int rss[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
@@ -1837,7 +1894,6 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
  	pte_t *pte;
  	pmd_t pmdval;
  	unsigned long start = addr;
-	bool can_reclaim_pt = reclaim_pt_is_enabled(start, end, details);
  	bool direct_reclaim = true;
  	int nr;
  
@@ -1878,7 +1934,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
  	 * from being repopulated by another thread.
  	 */
  	if (can_reclaim_pt && direct_reclaim && addr == end)
-		direct_reclaim = try_get_and_clear_pmd(mm, pmd, &pmdval);
+		direct_reclaim = zap_empty_pte_table(mm, pmd, &pmdval);
  
  	add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss);
  	lazy_mmu_mode_disable();
@@ -1907,10 +1963,12 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
  	}
  
  	if (can_reclaim_pt) {
-		if (direct_reclaim)
-			free_pte(mm, start, tlb, pmdval);
-		else
-			try_to_free_pte(mm, pmd, start, tlb);
+		if (!direct_reclaim)
+			direct_reclaim = zap_pte_table_if_empty(mm, pmd, start, &pmdval);
+		if (direct_reclaim) {
+			pte_free_tlb(tlb, pmd_pgtable(pmdval), addr);
+			mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
+		}
  	}
  
  	return addr;
diff --git a/mm/pt_reclaim.c b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 46771cfff8239..0000000000000
--- a/mm/pt_reclaim.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
-#include <linux/pgalloc.h>
-
-#include <asm/tlb.h>
-
-#include "internal.h"
-
-bool reclaim_pt_is_enabled(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
-			   struct zap_details *details)
-{
-	return details && details->reclaim_pt && (end - start >= PMD_SIZE);
-}
-
-bool try_get_and_clear_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t *pmdval)
-{
-	spinlock_t *pml = pmd_lockptr(mm, pmd);
-
-	if (!spin_trylock(pml))
-		return false;
-
-	*pmdval = pmdp_get_lockless(pmd);
-	pmd_clear(pmd);
-	spin_unlock(pml);
-
-	return true;
-}
-
-void free_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, struct mmu_gather *tlb,
-	      pmd_t pmdval)
-{
-	pte_free_tlb(tlb, pmd_pgtable(pmdval), addr);
-	mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
-}
-
-void try_to_free_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
-		     struct mmu_gather *tlb)
-{
-	pmd_t pmdval;
-	spinlock_t *pml, *ptl = NULL;
-	pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
-	int i;
-
-	pml = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
-	start_pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(mm, pmd, addr, &pmdval, &ptl);
-	if (!start_pte)
-		goto out_ptl;
-	if (ptl != pml)
-		spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
-
-	/* Check if it is empty PTE page */
-	for (i = 0, pte = start_pte; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, pte++) {
-		if (!pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))
-			goto out_ptl;
-	}
-	pte_unmap(start_pte);
-
-	pmd_clear(pmd);
-
-	if (ptl != pml)
-		spin_unlock(ptl);
-	spin_unlock(pml);
-
-	free_pte(mm, addr, tlb, pmdval);
-
-	return;
-out_ptl:
-	if (start_pte)
-		pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);
-	if (ptl != pml)
-		spin_unlock(pml);
-}
-- 
2.52.0


Completely untested, of course.

-- 
Cheers

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ