[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260118-dmabuf-revoke-v2-4-a03bb27c0875@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 14:08:48 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@...zbot.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio: Add pinned interface to perform revoke semantics
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
DMABUF ->pin() interface is called when the DMABUF importer perform
its DMA mapping, so let's use this opportunity to check if DMABUF
exporter revoked its buffer or not.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
index d4d0f7d08c53..af9c315ddf71 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
@@ -20,6 +20,20 @@ struct vfio_pci_dma_buf {
u8 revoked : 1;
};
+static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment)
+{
+ struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = attachment->dmabuf->priv;
+
+ dma_resv_assert_held(priv->dmabuf->resv);
+
+ return dma_buf_attachment_is_revoke(attachment) ? 0 : -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment)
+{
+ /* Do nothing */
+}
+
static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment)
{
@@ -76,6 +90,8 @@ static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_release(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
}
static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = {
+ .pin = vfio_pci_dma_buf_pin,
+ .unpin = vfio_pci_dma_buf_unpin,
.attach = vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach,
.map_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_map,
.unmap_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_unmap,
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists