[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd_4E4ftBU+qC=TD=_ECmmX-EgYzdDBf7GR69bUW7ETcAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 13:54:32 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
willy@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz, djwong@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
sandeen@...deen.net, rgoldwyn@...e.com, xiang@...nel.org, dsterba@...e.com,
pali@...nel.org, ebiggers@...nel.org, neil@...wn.name, amir73il@...il.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, cheol.lee@....com, jay.sim@....com, gunho.lee@....com,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/14] ntfs: update inode operations
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 5:30 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> > int ntfs_test_inode(struct inode *vi, void *data)
> > {
> > - ntfs_attr *na = (ntfs_attr *)data;
> > - ntfs_inode *ni;
> > + struct ntfs_attr *na = (struct ntfs_attr *)data;
>
> No need to cast from void pointers to other pointer types.
Okay.
>
> > + struct ntfs_inode *ni;
> >
> > if (vi->i_ino != na->mft_no)
> > return 0;
> > +
> > ni = NTFS_I(vi);
>
> Nit: If you're touchiung this anyway, the ni initialization could be
> moved to the declaration line.
Okay, I will fix them.
Thanks!
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists