[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3404f2f4-7edb-4bff-925b-0a6a7a450f5c@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:13:29 +0800
From: Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base PURWA-IOT-EVK board
On 1/17/2026 12:19 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/01/2026 11:41, YijieYang wrote:
>> From: Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
>>
>> The PURWA-IOT-EVK is an evaluation platform for IoT products, composed of
>> the Purwa IoT SoM and a carrier board. Together, they form a complete
>> embedded system capable of booting to UART.
>>
>> PURWA-IOT-EVK uses the PS8833 as a retimer for USB0, unlike HAMOA-IOT-EVK.
>> Meanwhile, USB0 bypasses the SBU selector FSUSB42.
>>
>
> NAK.
>
> Warnings were reported at v3. Did you address them? No, you completely
> ignored them, so warnings are reported again at v4.
>
> What do you think these emails are for?
This warning is caused by the pcie3_phy node in purwa.dtsi, which is not
introduced by this patch set. Since it does not impact functionality,
would it be appropriate to fix it in a separate patch?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
Best Regards,
Yijie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists