linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] irqchip/gic-v5: Code first ACPI boot support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pl751zeh.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:54:14 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
 <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
 Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] irqchip/gic-v5: Code first ACPI boot support

On Mon, Jan 19 2026 at 09:19, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 03:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I think the simplest way to sort this out is for this series to go via
> the ACPI tree if that's OK for Thomas, given that the ACPICA code will
> go via the ACPI tree anyway and there are other dependencies on it there
> I assume (this series is fairly self-contained).

I'm fine with that

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>