[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DFSM9IHXY24S.3W4T39VHEH420@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 13:56:55 +0000
From: Radim Krčmář
<radim.krcmar@....qualcomm.com>
To: <fangyu.yu@...ux.alibaba.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <corbet@....net>,
<anup@...infault.org>, <atish.patra@...ux.dev>, <pjw@...nel.org>,
<palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: <guoren@...nel.org>, <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, <rkrcmar@...tanamicro.com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: KVM: add KVM_CAP_RISCV_SET_HGATP_MODE
2026-01-05T22:32:32+08:00, <fangyu.yu@...ux.alibaba.com>:
> From: Fangyu Yu <fangyu.yu@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> This capability allows userspace to explicitly select the HGATP mode
> for the VM. The selected mode must be less than or equal to the max
> HGATP mode supported by the hardware. This capability must be enabled
> before creating any vCPUs, and can only be set once per VM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fangyu Yu <fangyu.yu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c
> @@ -212,12 +219,27 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>
> int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
> {
> + if (cap->flags)
> + return -EINVAL;
> switch (cap->cap) {
> + case KVM_CAP_RISCV_SET_HGATP_MODE:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + if (cap->args[0] < HGATP_MODE_SV39X4 ||
> + cap->args[0] > kvm_riscv_gstage_max_mode)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (kvm->arch.gstage_mode_initialized)
> + return 0;
"must be enabled before creating any vCPUs" check is missing.
> + kvm->arch.gstage_mode_initialized = true;
> + kvm->arch.kvm_riscv_gstage_mode = cap->args[0];
> + kvm->arch.kvm_riscv_gstage_pgd_levels = 3 +
> + kvm->arch.kvm_riscv_gstage_mode - HGATP_MODE_SV39X4;
Even before creating VCPUs, I don't see enough protections to make this
work.
Userspace can only provide a hint about the physical address space size
before any other KVM code could have acted on the information.
It would be a serious issue if some code would operate on hgatp as if it
were X and others as Y.
The simplest solution would be to ensure that the CAP_SET VM ioctl can
only be executed before any other IOCTL, but a change in generic code to
achieve it would be frowned upon...
I would recommend looking at kvm_are_all_memslots_empty() first, as it's
quite likely that it could be sufficient for the purposes of changing
hgatp.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists