[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8deae27e-1e9f-4bc0-8d60-0173cf92942f@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:33:30 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/vdso: Use 32-bit CHECKFLAGS for compat vDSO
On 2026-01-18 23:20, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 11:05:05PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 16 2026 at 08:40, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> Manually override the CHECKFLAGS for the compat vDSO with the correct
>>> 32-bit configuration.
>>
>> Fun. I just fixed the same thing half an hour ago:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260117215542.342638347@kernel.org/
>
> Assuming you are going to apply your patches bevore, can I respin my
> remaining patches on top of tip/x86/entry?
>
Please do.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists