linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/3] x86/hyperv: Use savesegment() instead of inline asm() to save segment registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40e224c7-3809-4c84-9819-cd7350365f0e@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 08:22:00 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/3] x86/hyperv: Use savesegment() instead of
 inline asm() to save segment registers

On 2026-01-05 01:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Use standard savesegment() utility macro to save segment registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@...or.com>