[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8436e914-429f-40b9-8e6f-ec3b02702cad@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:32:56 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: abdurrahman@...thop.ai
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] spi: xilinx: use device property accessors.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 07:06:24AM +0000, Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay wrote:
> - of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "xlnx,num-ss-bits",
> - &num_cs);
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> - "xlnx,num-transfer-bits",
> - &bits_per_word);
> + device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "xlnx,num-ss-bits",
> + &num_cs);
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev,
> + "xlnx,num-transfer-bits",
> + &bits_per_word);
Are these bindings appropraite for ACPI systems?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists