[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260119175732.1444-1-jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:57:32 +0000
From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
To: heming.zhao@...e.com
Cc: jiashengjiangcool@...il.com,
jlbec@...lplan.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark@...heh.com,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_xattr_get_rec
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 22:49:16 +0800, Heming Zhao wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 05:35:56PM +0000, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
>> In ocfs2_xattr_get_rec, the variable 'rec' is initialized to NULL.
>> If the extent list 'el' is empty (l_next_free_rec == 0), the loop
>> iterating over the records is skipped, leaving 'rec' as NULL.
>>
>> Since 'e_blkno' is initialized to 0, the function enters the error
>> handling block 'if (!e_blkno)'. Inside this block, the function calls
>> ocfs2_error() and attempts to dereference 'rec' via
>> 'le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos)' and 'ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, rec)'. This
>> results in a NULL pointer dereference and a kernel panic.
>
> Do you have reproduction steps to support your analysis?
>
> - Heming
Regarding the reproduction steps, we detected this issue through static
analysis. We do not have a specific script to reproduce this as it
requires a corrupted filesystem image.
However, if the filesystem metadata is corrupted (e.g., due to bit rot
or software bugs), it is possible that l_next_free_rec reads as 0. In
the current implementation, such inconsistency leads to a NULL pointer
dereference and panics the system.
This patch is intended as a hardening measure. Instead of crashing the
kernel when encountering such invalid on-disk data, it is safer to report
a filesystem error via ocfs2_error and abort the operation gracefully.
This approach aligns with recent fixes in OCFS2. For example, Commit
44acc46d182f ("ocfs2: avoid NULL pointer dereference in
dx_dir_lookup_rec()") addressed an identical issue where an empty extent
list left the 'rec' pointer NULL.
I will update the commit message in the next version to explicitly state
that this is a hardening measure against on-disk corruption, ensuring the
rationale is accurate.
- Jiasheng
>>
>> Fix this by ensuring 'rec' is not NULL before accessing its members
>> within the error handling path, or by checking for an empty list
>> explicitly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
>> index 1b21fbc16d73..b018c84dbc05 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
>> @@ -3757,10 +3757,16 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_get_rec(struct inode *inode,
>> }
>>
>> if (!e_blkno) {
>> - ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb, "Inode %lu has bad extent record (%u, %u, 0) in xattr\n",
>> - inode->i_ino,
>> - le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos),
>> - ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, rec));
>> + if (rec)
>> + ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
>> + "Inode %lu has bad extent record (%u, %u, 0) in xattr\n",
>> + inode->i_ino,
>> + le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos),
>> + ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, rec));
>> + else
>> + ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
>> + "Inode %lu has bad extent record (NULL) in xattr\n",
>> + inode->i_ino);
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists