[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260119195047.86E3C696@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:50:47 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sohil.mehta@...el.com, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jon Kohler <jon@...anix.com>, Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu: Take Intel platform into account for old microcode checks
There was a report[1] that CPUs running updated microcode were being
reported as running old microcode. The reason is that the old
microcode list neglects to take the platform ID into account.
The platform ID is an Intel-only construct that allows CPUs that
otherwise have the same model/family/stepping to take different
microcode revisions. The microcode loader itself already checks this.
Only the recent "old_microcode" checker failed here.
Treat the platform ID as a peer of model/family/stepping. Store it
in 'struct cpuinfo_x86', enable matching on it with with 'struct
x86_cpu_id', and flesh out the 'old_microcode' list with it.
This fixes the report of an inaccurate, false positive in the
'old_microcode' vulnerability file.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/38660F8F-499E-48CD-B58B-4822228A5941@nutanix.com/
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: Jon Kohler <jon@...anix.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists