[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aW6WW6S3Qq/usQyi@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:38:51 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@...inux.co.jp>
Cc: dave.jiang@...el.com, cassel@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org,
kwilczynski@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, robh@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
jdmason@...zu.us, allenbh@...il.com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
ntb@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, magnus.damm@...il.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, jbrunet@...libre.com,
utkarsh02t@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 18/38] NTB: ntb_transport: Use ntb_get_dma_dev()
On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 10:54:20PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> Replace direct use of ntb->pdev with ntb_get_dma_dev() for DMA-safe
> allocations and frees. This allows ntb_transport to operate on NTB
> implementations that are not backed by a PCI device from IOMMU
> perspective.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@...inux.co.jp>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> index 6ed680d0470f..7b320249629c 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> @@ -771,13 +771,13 @@ static void ntb_transport_msi_desc_changed(void *data)
> static void ntb_free_mw(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt, int num_mw)
> {
> struct ntb_transport_mw *mw = &nt->mw_vec[num_mw];
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = nt->ndev->pdev;
> + struct device *dev = ntb_get_dma_dev(nt->ndev);
>
> - if (!mw->virt_addr)
> + if (!dev || !mw->virt_addr)
> return;
>
> ntb_mw_clear_trans(nt->ndev, PIDX, num_mw);
> - dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, mw->alloc_size,
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, mw->alloc_size,
> mw->alloc_addr, mw->dma_addr);
> mw->xlat_size = 0;
> mw->buff_size = 0;
> @@ -847,13 +847,13 @@ static int ntb_set_mw(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt, int num_mw,
> resource_size_t size)
> {
> struct ntb_transport_mw *mw = &nt->mw_vec[num_mw];
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = nt->ndev->pdev;
> + struct device *dev = ntb_get_dma_dev(nt->ndev);
> size_t xlat_size, buff_size;
> resource_size_t xlat_align;
> resource_size_t xlat_align_size;
> int rc;
>
> - if (!size)
> + if (!dev || !size)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> rc = ntb_mw_get_align(nt->ndev, PIDX, num_mw, &xlat_align,
> @@ -876,12 +876,12 @@ static int ntb_set_mw(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt, int num_mw,
> mw->buff_size = buff_size;
> mw->alloc_size = buff_size;
>
> - rc = ntb_alloc_mw_buffer(mw, &pdev->dev, xlat_align);
> + rc = ntb_alloc_mw_buffer(mw, dev, xlat_align);
> if (rc) {
> mw->alloc_size *= 2;
> - rc = ntb_alloc_mw_buffer(mw, &pdev->dev, xlat_align);
> + rc = ntb_alloc_mw_buffer(mw, dev, xlat_align);
> if (rc) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + dev_err(dev,
> "Unable to alloc aligned MW buff\n");
> mw->xlat_size = 0;
> mw->buff_size = 0;
> @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int ntb_set_mw(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt, int num_mw,
> rc = ntb_mw_set_trans(nt->ndev, PIDX, num_mw, mw->dma_addr,
> mw->xlat_size);
> if (rc) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to set mw%d translation", num_mw);
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to set mw%d translation", num_mw);
> ntb_free_mw(nt, num_mw);
> return -EIO;
> }
> --
> 2.51.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists