linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] scripts: introduce containerized builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260119214931.GA1058062@ax162>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:49:31 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@...cker.io>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Onur Özkan <work@...rozkan.dev>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	automated-testing@...ts.yoctoproject.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Nicolas Schier <nsc@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] scripts: introduce containerized builds

On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 02:35:16PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> I will apply this to kbuild-next-unstable shortly to give folks a week
> or so to voice any objections or give critical review comments.

During application, checkpatch.pl pointed out that this should have a
MAINTAINERS entry. Would you be opposed to the following?

CONTAINER BUILD SCRIPT
M:	Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@...cker.io>
S:	Maintained
F:	Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst
F:	scripts/container

I will also add scripts/container to the kbuild entry. Now that I am
looking, it looks like Nicolas has been left out of this whole thread,
cc'ing him now (even though I assume he should have seen this through
linux-kbuild but just in case not, the top of the thread is
https://lore.kernel.org/cover.1767199119.git.gtucker@gtucker.io/).

Cheers,
Nathan