[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aW6rAjJ5hz5BYuAR@pavilion.home>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 23:06:58 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify idle cputime
granularity test
Le Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 01:30:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 3:53 PM Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > cpufreq calls get_cpu_idle_time_us() just to know if idle cputime
> > accounting has a nanoseconds granularity.
> >
> > Use the appropriate indicator instead to make that deduction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael@...nel.org>
>
> or please let me know if you want me to take this patch.
The patch is standalone but the rest of the patchset depends on it.
Now I don't target this patchset for v6.20-rc1.
So if you manage to sneak this patch in for v6.20-rc1, it works because
I'll rebase on -rc1. Otherwise I'll need to keep it to avoid breaking
some code assumptions.
What do you think?
Thanks.
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists