[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <846a25a5-60d4-4d6c-8d06-cd7b96fce8df@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:13:13 +0530
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Zecheng Li <zli94@...u.edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "Peter
Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
CC: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman
<mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel
<riel@...riel.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Madadi Vineeth Reddy
<vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>, Xu Liu <xliuprof@...gle.com>, Blake Jones
<blakejones@...gle.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Nilay Vaish
<nilayvaish@...gle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Zecheng Li
<zecheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] sched/fair: Remove task_group->se pointer array
Hello Zecheng,
On 1/18/2026 9:04 AM, Zecheng Li wrote:
> @@ -2201,6 +2200,26 @@ struct cfs_tg_state {
> struct sched_entity se;
> struct sched_statistics stats;
> } __no_randomize_layout;
> +
> +static inline struct sched_entity *tg_se(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
> +{
> + if (is_root_task_group(tg))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + struct cfs_tg_state *state =
nit. Can you move the declaration of "struct cfs_tg_state *state" to the
top of the function. Same for cfs_rq_se().
> + container_of(tg->cfs_rq[cpu], struct cfs_tg_state, cfs_rq);
> + return &state->se;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct sched_entity *cfs_rq_se(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> + if (is_root_task_group(cfs_rq->tg))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + struct cfs_tg_state *state =
> + container_of(cfs_rq, struct cfs_tg_state, cfs_rq);
> + return &state->se;
> +}
> #endif
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists