[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260119070246.249499-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:02:44 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf, x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64
Inline bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() for x86_64
to obtain better performance, and add the testcase for it.
Changes since v4:
* don't support the !CONFIG_SMP case
* v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260112104529.224645-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/
Changes since v3:
* handle the !CONFIG_SMP case
* ignore the !CONFIG_SMP case in the testcase, as we enable CONFIG_SMP
for x86_64 in the selftests
Changes since v2:
* implement it in the verifier with BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG() instead of in
x86_64 JIT (Alexei).
Changes since v1:
* add the testcase
* remove the usage of const_current_task
Menglong Dong (2):
bpf, x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64
selftests/bpf: test the jited inline of bpf_get_current_task
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 22 ++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_jit_inline.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_jit_inline.c
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists