[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a4yac82m.fsf@posteo.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 08:36:52 +0000
From: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@...teo.net>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Onur Özkan <work@...rozkan.dev>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, lossin@...nel.org,
a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu,
dakr@...nel.org, yutaro.ono.418@...il.com, borys.tyran@...tonmail.com,
daniel@...lak.dev, tamird@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] rbtree: reduce unsafe blocks on pointer derefs
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 1:13 PM Charalampos Mitrodimas
> <charmitro@...teo.net> wrote:
>>
>> This is a nice change to have if it reaches the general consensus.
>>
>> Acked-By: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@...teo.net>
>
> So, typically, Acked-by tags are given by maintainers of the code.
> Sometimes, other stakeholders give it too:
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
>
> I will keep the tag, but if this was meant to be a Reviewed-by or
> similar instead, please let me know.
Hi Miguel,
I was not aware, thanks for the heads up! Assume it is a Reviewed-by or
just discard since it's invalid.
>
> (Nit: it is usually -by, not -By).
Ah yes, need to update my email client snippet configuration.
C. Mitrodimas
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists