[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cc944b3-8a41-45a2-95c8-c55dbcbf0830@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:08:07 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov
<lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/dpu: fix SSPP_UBWC_STATIC_CTRL programming
on UBWC 5.x+
On 1/19/26 9:17 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Code in dpu_hw_sspp_setup_format() doesn't handle UBWC versions bigger
> than 4.0. Replace switch-case with if-else checks, making sure that the
> register is initialized on UBWC 5.x (and later) hosts.
>
> Fixes: c2577fc1740d ("drm/msm/dpu: Add support for SM8750")
> Tested-by: Val Packett <val@...kett.cool> # x1e80100-dell-latitude-7455
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c | 44 +++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> index a99e33230514..80a9fb76b139 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static void dpu_hw_sspp_setup_format(struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe,
>
> if (fmt->fetch_mode != MDP_FETCH_LINEAR) {
> u32 hbb = ctx->ubwc->highest_bank_bit - 13;
> + u32 ctrl_val;
>
> if (MSM_FORMAT_IS_UBWC(fmt))
> opmode |= MDSS_MDP_OP_BWC_EN;
> @@ -286,30 +287,31 @@ static void dpu_hw_sspp_setup_format(struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe,
> DPU_REG_WRITE(c, SSPP_FETCH_CONFIG,
> DPU_FETCH_CONFIG_RESET_VALUE |
> hbb << 18);
> - switch (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version) {
> - case UBWC_1_0:
> +
> + if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_1_0) {
> fast_clear = fmt->alpha_enable ? BIT(31) : 0;
> - DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> - fast_clear | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle & 0x1) |
> - BIT(8) |
> - (hbb << 4));
> - break;
> - case UBWC_2_0:
> + ctrl_val = fast_clear | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle & 0x1) |
> + BIT(8) | (hbb << 4);
> + } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_2_0) {
> fast_clear = fmt->alpha_enable ? BIT(31) : 0;
> - DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> - fast_clear | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle) |
> - (hbb << 4));
> - break;
> - case UBWC_3_0:
> - DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> - BIT(30) | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle) |
> - (hbb << 4));
> - break;
> - case UBWC_4_0:
> - DPU_REG_WRITE(c, ubwc_static_ctrl_off,
> - MSM_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt) ? 0 : BIT(30));
> - break;
> + ctrl_val = fast_clear | ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle | (hbb << 4);
> + } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_3_0) {
> + ctrl_val = BIT(30) | (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_swizzle) | (hbb << 4);
> + } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version == UBWC_4_0) {
> + ctrl_val = MSM_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt) ? 0 : BIT(30);
> + } else if (ctx->ubwc->ubwc_enc_version <= UBWC_6_0) {
> + if (MSM_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt))
> + ctrl_val = 0;
> + else if (MSM_FORMAT_IS_DX(fmt)) /* or FP16, but it's unsupported */
> + ctrl_val = BIT(30);
> + else
> + ctrl_val = BIT(30) | BIT(31);
Can we name these magic bits?
There's 2 more bitfields that I see downstream sets here (but it
doesn't claim to support UBWC6)..
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists