[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7rzlxxqawgasthkhlk2fccync42blr3mehtfbylcsihy7kr5m5@m2bzma4qifo7>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 19:32:02 +0800
From: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/21] slab: introduce percpu sheaves bootstrap
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 03:40:26PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Until now, kmem_cache->cpu_sheaves was !NULL only for caches with
> sheaves enabled. Since we want to enable them for almost all caches,
> it's suboptimal to test the pointer in the fast paths, so instead
> allocate it for all caches in do_kmem_cache_create(). Instead of testing
> the cpu_sheaves pointer to recognize caches (yet) without sheaves, test
> kmem_cache->sheaf_capacity for being 0, where needed, using a new
> cache_has_sheaves() helper.
>
> However, for the fast paths sake we also assume that the main sheaf
> always exists (pcs->main is !NULL), and during bootstrap we cannot
> allocate sheaves yet.
>
> Solve this by introducing a single static bootstrap_sheaf that's
> assigned as pcs->main during bootstrap. It has a size of 0, so during
> allocations, the fast path will find it's empty. Since the size of 0
> matches sheaf_capacity of 0, the freeing fast paths will find it's
> "full". In the slow path handlers, we use cache_has_sheaves() to
> recognize that the cache doesn't (yet) have real sheaves, and fall back.
> Thus sharing the single bootstrap sheaf like this for multiple caches
> and cpus is safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
Nit: would it make sense to also update "if (s->cpu_sheaves)" to
cache_has_sheaves() in kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(), for consistency?
--
Thanks,
Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists