[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260119114333.GI1890602@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:43:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, frederic@...nel.org, joelagnelf@...dia.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, srikar@...ux.ibm.com, sshegde@...ux.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, urezki@...il.com, samir@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuhp: Expedite synchronize_rcu during SMT switch
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 04:17:40PM +0530, Vishal Chourasia wrote:
> Expedite synchronize_rcu() during the cpuhp_smt_[enable|disable] path to
> accelerate the operation.
>
> Bulk CPU hotplug operations—such as switching SMT modes across all
> cores—require hotplugging multiple CPUs in rapid succession. On large
> systems, this process takes significant time, increasing as the number
> of CPUs to hotplug during SMT switch grows, leading to substantial
> delays on high-core-count machines. Analysis [1] reveals that the
> majority of this time is spent waiting for synchronize_rcu().
>
You seem to have left out all the useful bits from your changelog again
:/
Anyway, ISTR Joel posted a patch hoisting a lock; it was a icky, but not
something we can't live with either.
Also, memory got jogged and I think something like the below will remove
2/3 of your rcu woes as well.
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 8df2d773fe3b..1365c19444b2 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2669,6 +2669,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
int cpu, ret = 0;
cpu_maps_update_begin();
+ rcu_sync_enter(&cpu_hotplug_lock.rss);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
continue;
@@ -2698,6 +2699,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
}
if (!ret)
cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
+ rcu_sync_exit(&cpu_hotplug_lock.rss);
cpu_maps_update_done();
return ret;
}
@@ -2715,6 +2717,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
int cpu, ret = 0;
cpu_maps_update_begin();
+ rcu_sync_enter(&cpu_hotplug_lock.rss);
cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
/* Skip online CPUs and CPUs on offline nodes */
@@ -2728,6 +2731,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
/* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
cpuhp_online_cpu_device(cpu);
}
+ rcu_sync_exit(&cpu_hotplug_lock.rss);
cpu_maps_update_done();
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists