[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aW93cQq0Cyd9ivpE@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:39:13 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Elle Rhumsaa <elle@...thered-steel.dev>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: sync: atomic: Remove bound `T: Sync` for `Atomci::from_ptr()`
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 07:52:06PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Originally, `Atomic::from_ptr()` requires `T` being a `Sync` because I
> thought having the ability to do `from_ptr()` meant multiplle
> `&Atomic<T>`s shared by different threads, which was identical (or
> similar) to multiple `&T`s shared by different threads. Hence `T` was
> required to be `Sync`. However this is not true, since `&Atomic<T>` is
> not the same at `&T`. Moreover, having this bound makes `Atomic::<*mut
> T>::from_ptr()` impossible, which is definitely not intended. Therefore
> remove the `T: Sync` bound.
>
> Fixes: 29c32c405e53 ("rust: sync: atomic: Add generic atomics")
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
there is a typo in patch title
Powered by blists - more mailing lists