linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] softirq: Print the function name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d0c06cf1-74b8-494a-b6d5-8f06fcdc19a1@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 08:26:34 +0800
From: "enlin.mu" <enlin.mu@...ux.dev>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org, ryotkkr98@...il.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, enlin.mu@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: Print the function name



On 2026/1/12 19:06, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2026-01-08 22:39:14 [+0100], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06 2026 at 14:16, enlin.mu wrote:
>>> On 2026/1/5 17:41, Enlin Mu wrote:
>>>> Adjust the printing format from the function address to
>>>> the function name.
> …
>> The TIMER softirq always invoked run_timer_softirq(). If that happens
>> then the interesting question is not the softirq action handler, but any
>> function it invoked from there. So there is _zero_ value of adding this.
> 
> Removing h->action from the print would be an improvement.
> 
If everyone agrees, I'll resubmit a patch.
>> Thanks,
>>
>>          tglx
> 
> Sebastian