[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260120155241.GG1354723@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:52:41 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
tools@...nel.org, users@...nel.org
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Juan Yescas <jyescas@...gle.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 14:38:03 +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> > With the attached patches the Samsung s5m RTC driver is simplified a
> > little bit with regards to alarm IRQ acquisition.
> >
> > The end result is that instead of having a list of IRQ numbers for each
> > variant (and a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure consistency), the RTC driver
> > queries the 'alarm' platform resource from the parent (mfd cell).
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/3] mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource
> (no commit info)
> [2/3] rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ
> commit: c70aee3dd85482c67720eb642d59ebbb9433faa5
> [3/3] mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data
> (no commit info)
Looks like b4 is having a bad day.
I just applied v3, not this set.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists