[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343168.1768935284@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:54:44 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 11/12] x509, pkcs7: Limit crypto combinations that may be used for module signing
Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com> wrote:
> > + { "rsa", "emsa-pss", "sha512" },
>
> Don't we want to allow sha256 for emsa-pss?
We do. I already added that for v14.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists