[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec1fbc52-3e72-4a0f-954c-9ecf581f9e39@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:56:12 +0530
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)"
<chleroy@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "Alexander
Gordeev" <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Anna-Maria Behnsen
<anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Heiko Carstens
<hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jan Kiszka
<jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, Juri Lelli
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>, "Madhavan
Srinivasan" <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, "Michael
Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, "Paul E . McKenney"
<paulmck@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Sven Schnelle
<svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Uladzislau Rezki
<urezki@...il.com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Vasily Gorbik
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, "Viresh
Kumar" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@....com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] sched/idle: Handle offlining first in idle loop
Hello Frederic, Peter,
On 1/20/2026 2:34 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 01:53:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 03:51:54PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>
>>> kernel/sched/idle.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>>> index c174afe1dd17..35d79af3286d 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>>> @@ -260,6 +260,12 @@ static void do_idle(void)
>>> {
>>> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>>
>>> + if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) {
>>
>> Does it make sense to make that: if (unlikely(cpu_is_offline(cpu))) ?
>
> Yes indeed!
nit. but don't we inherit it from:
#define cpu_is_offline(cpu) unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))
so it will end up being annotated with unlikely() no?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists