[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAywjhT=QwKyh2XYJ82MQ-1Ot8Vv+8t69p8JdVTKhA=LX+c_jA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:14:03 -0800
From: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
To: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@...omium.org>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@...byteword.org>, Aashish Sharma <aashish@...hishsharma.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down
PASID entry
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 5:56 AM Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 02:18:12PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > The Intel VT-d Scalable Mode PASID table entry consists of 512 bits (64
> > bytes). When tearing down an entry, the current implementation zeros the
> > entire 64-byte structure immediately using multiple 64-bit writes.
> >
> > Since the IOMMU hardware may fetch these 64 bytes using multiple
> > internal transactions (e.g., four 128-bit bursts), updating or zeroing
> > the entire entry while it is active (P=1) risks a "torn" read. If a
> > hardware fetch occurs simultaneously with the CPU zeroing the entry, the
> > hardware could observe an inconsistent state, leading to unpredictable
> > behavior or spurious faults.
> >
> > Follow the "Guidance to Software for Invalidations" in the VT-d spec
> > (Section 6.5.3.3) by implementing the recommended ownership handshake:
> >
> > 1. Clear only the 'Present' (P) bit of the PASID entry.
> > 2. Use a dma_wmb() to ensure the cleared bit is visible to hardware
> > before proceeding.
> > 3. Execute the required invalidation sequence (PASID cache, IOTLB, and
> > Device-TLB flush) to ensure the hardware has released all cached
> > references.
> > 4. Only after the flushes are complete, zero out the remaining fields
> > of the PASID entry.
> >
> > Also, add a dma_wmb() in pasid_set_present() to ensure that all other
> > fields of the PASID entry are visible to the hardware before the Present
> > bit is set.
> >
> > Fixes: 0bbeb01a4faf ("iommu/vt-d: Manage scalalble mode PASID tables")
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@...omium.org>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 6 +++++-
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
> > index b4c85242dc79..0b303bd0b0c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
> > @@ -234,9 +234,23 @@ static inline void pasid_set_wpe(struct pasid_entry *pe)
> > */
> > static inline void pasid_set_present(struct pasid_entry *pe)
> > {
> > + dma_wmb();
> > pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[0], 1 << 0, 1);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Clear the Present (P) bit (bit 0) of a scalable-mode PASID table entry.
> > + * This initiates the transition of the entry's ownership from hardware
> > + * to software. The caller is responsible for fulfilling the invalidation
> > + * handshake recommended by the VT-d spec, Section 6.5.3.3 (Guidance to
> > + * Software for Invalidations).
> > + */
> > +static inline void pasid_clear_present(struct pasid_entry *pe)
> > +{
> > + pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[0], 1 << 0, 0);
> > + dma_wmb();
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Setup Page Walk Snoop bit (Bit 87) of a scalable mode PASID
> > * entry.
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> > index 3e2255057079..eb069aefa4fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> > @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
> >
> > did = pasid_get_domain_id(pte);
> > pgtt = pasid_pte_get_pgtt(pte);
> > - intel_pasid_clear_entry(dev, pasid, fault_ignore);
> > + pasid_clear_present(pte);
> > spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> >
> > if (!ecap_coherent(iommu->ecap))
> > @@ -286,6 +286,10 @@ void intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
> > iommu->flush.flush_iotlb(iommu, did, 0, 0, DMA_TLB_DSI_FLUSH);
> >
> > devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid(iommu, dev, pasid);
> > + intel_pasid_clear_entry(dev, pasid, fault_ignore);
> > + if (!ecap_coherent(iommu->ecap))
> > + clflush_cache_range(pte, sizeof(*pte));
> > +
> > if (!fault_ignore)
> > intel_iommu_drain_pasid_prq(dev, pasid);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.43.0
Reviewed-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists