[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <916995f4-60e0-47dc-abdb-8819089d103c@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:28:40 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
tools@...nel.org, users@...nel.org,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Juan Yescas <jyescas@...gle.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 05:24:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2026, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If you fetch a series but don't delete it from the database then (with
> > b4 ty -d) then b4 will remember it and if any commits in what gets
> > applied match it'll generate a mail for b4 ty -a. Usually that's when
> > some commits didn't get changed.
> The last attempt to apply this failed with conflicts.
> I wonder why b4 stored that as a success?
Are you using b4 shazam? I wonder if under the hood it's a mailbox
fetch then an apply. I download a mailbox then script my own
application after the fact so it's not so surprising that it happens for
me, b4 knows nothing about the patches actually being applied until I
tell it to go look to send thanks.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists