lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b515af46-87f9-49eb-9d05-08315b25eb96@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:10:06 -0500
From: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@....com>
To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: James Dingwall <james@...gwall.me.uk>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko
	<oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partial revert "x86/xen: fix balloon target
 initialization for PVH dom0"

On 2026-01-20 09:06, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> This partially reverts commit 87af633689ce16ddb166c80f32b120e50b1295de so
> the current memory target for PV guests is still fetched from
> start_info->nr_pages, which matches exactly what the toolstack sets the
> initial memory target to.
> 
> Using get_num_physpages() is possible on PV also, but needs adjusting to
> take into account the ISA hole and the PFN at 0 not considered usable
> memory depite being populated, and hence would need extra adjustments.
> Instead of carrying those extra adjustments switch back to the previous
> code.  That leaves Linux with a difference in how current memory target is
> obtained for HVM vs PV, but that's better than adding extra logic just for
> PV.
> 
> Also, for HVM the target is not (and has never been) accurately calculated,
> as in that case part of what starts as guest memory is reused by hvmloader
> and possibly other firmware to store ACPI tables and similar firmware
> information, thus the memory is no longer being reported as RAM in the
> memory map.
> 
> Reported-by: James Dingwall <james@...gwall.me.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>

Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@....com>

Thanks,
Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ