lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <knn6gyidf6675wzt63hjsoxixqp5x65x3nwqsoi5gizqa76bog@kcvsazfh2lgu>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:04:49 +0800
From: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>, 
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, 
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, 
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/21] slab: handle kmalloc sheaves bootstrap

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 03:40:28PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Enable sheaves for kmalloc caches. For other types than KMALLOC_NORMAL,
> we can simply allow them in calculate_sizes() as they are created later
> than KMALLOC_NORMAL caches and can allocate sheaves and barns from
> those.
> 
> For KMALLOC_NORMAL caches we perform additional step after first
> creating them without sheaves. Then bootstrap_cache_sheaves() simply
> allocates and initializes barns and sheaves and finally sets
> s->sheaf_capacity to make them actually used.
> 
> Afterwards the only caches left without sheaves (unless SLUB_TINY or
> debugging is enabled) are kmem_cache and kmem_cache_node. These are only
> used when creating or destroying other kmem_caches. Thus they are not
> performance critical and we can simply leave it that way.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Looks good to me. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>

-- 
Thanks,
Hao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ