[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72b8804b-8871-41f8-81ee-6e0286ecaa8e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:28:41 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@...nel.org>
To: Vijay Kumar Tumati <vijay.tumati@....qualcomm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeyaprakash.soundrapandian@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/5] media: dt-bindings: Add CAMSS device for
SM8750
On 20/01/2026 18:58, Vijay Kumar Tumati wrote:
>
>
> On 1/20/2026 1:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:42:51PM -0800, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
>>> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 1
>>> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 2
>>> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 3
>>> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 4
>>> + - description: Registers for TPG 0
>>> + - description: Registers for TPG 1
>>> + - description: Registers for TPG 2
>>> +
>>> + reg-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: csid0
>>> + - const: csid1
>>> + - const: csid2
>>> + - const: csid_lite0
>>> + - const: csid_lite1
>>> + - const: csiphy0
>>> + - const: csiphy1
>>> + - const: csiphy2
>>> + - const: csiphy3
>>> + - const: csiphy4
>>> + - const: csiphy5
>>
>> Same comment as last time - nothing got resolved, nothing got concluded.
>>
>> And before you claim without supporting arguments "we are not blocking"
>> let me clarify: yes, you are blocked, because I am not taking bindings
>> which are known to be incomplete, not finished and already being
>> changed/worked on.
> Hi Bryan, can you please advise on how to go about this? I don't think I
> see the driver support in CAMSS for separate CSIPHY nodes on linux-next.
> Are we mandating anything about this wrt ongoing patches? Thanks.
Since 6.20 is close I'll hold off on posting a new large series but
yeah, I have updates ready to go.
I'm thinking camss should have a "simple-bus" and instantiate the
CSIPHYs as sub-nodes, instead of having them be entirely separate.
But sure, that'll come out in the wash.
FWIW I agree with Krzysztof, it's more important to zero-in on correct
and sustainable long term bindings.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists