lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a33ca7002696a666e2b51fc80ce01bac1381e3f.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 22:38:07 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "x86@...nel.org"
	<x86@...nel.org>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
	<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>,
	"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "tglx@...nel.org"
	<tglx@...nel.org>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev"
	<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Huang, Kai"
	<kai.huang@...el.com>, "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
	"ackerleytng@...gle.com" <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tdx: Use pg_level in TDX APIs, not the TDX-Module's
 0-based level

On Tue, 2026-01-20 at 12:39 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Rework the TDX APIs to take the kernel's 1-based pg_level enum, not the
> > TDX-Module's 0-based level.  The APIs are _kernel_ APIs, not TDX-Module
> > APIs, and the kernel (and KVM) uses "enum pg_level" literally everywhere.
> > 
> > Using "enum pg_level" eliminates ambiguity when looking at the APIs (it's
> > NOT clear that "int level" refers to the TDX-Module's level), and will
> > allow for using existing helpers like page_level_size() when support for
> > hugepages is added to the S-EPT APIs.
> > 
> > No functional change intended.

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>

> > 
> > Cc: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> > Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> > Cc: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Compile-tested only.  Came across this when looking at the S-EPT hugepage
> > series, specifically this code:
> >   
> >    unsigned long npages = 1 << (level * PTE_SHIFT);
> > 
> > which I was _sure_ was broken, until I realized @level wasn't what I thought
> > it was.
> >  
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h  | 14 ++++----------
> >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c      | 11 ++++-------
> >  arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

The line increase is just from wrapped lines, so it's kinda less code.

> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> > index 6b338d7f01b7..bc0d03e70fd6 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> > @@ -189,19 +189,13 @@ static inline u64 mk_keyed_paddr(u16 hkid, struct page *page)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline int pg_level_to_tdx_sept_level(enum pg_level level)
> > -{
> > -        WARN_ON_ONCE(level == PG_LEVEL_NONE);
> > -        return level - 1;
> > -}
> > -
> >  u64 tdh_vp_enter(struct tdx_vp *vp, struct tdx_module_args *args);
> >  u64 tdh_mng_addcx(struct tdx_td *td, struct page *tdcs_page);
> >  u64 tdh_mem_page_add(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, struct page *page, struct page *source, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> > -u64 tdh_mem_sept_add(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, int level, struct page *page, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> > +u64 tdh_mem_sept_add(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, enum pg_level level, struct page *page, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> >  u64 tdh_vp_addcx(struct tdx_vp *vp, struct page *tdcx_page);
> > -u64 tdh_mem_page_aug(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, int level, struct page *page, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> > -u64 tdh_mem_range_block(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, int level, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> > +u64 tdh_mem_page_aug(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, enum pg_level level, struct page *page, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> > +u64 tdh_mem_range_block(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, enum pg_level level, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> >  u64 tdh_mng_key_config(struct tdx_td *td);
> >  u64 tdh_mng_create(struct tdx_td *td, u16 hkid);
> >  u64 tdh_vp_create(struct tdx_td *td, struct tdx_vp *vp);
> > @@ -217,7 +211,7 @@ u64 tdh_vp_rd(struct tdx_vp *vp, u64 field, u64 *data);
> >  u64 tdh_vp_wr(struct tdx_vp *vp, u64 field, u64 data, u64 mask);
> >  u64 tdh_phymem_page_reclaim(struct page *page, u64 *tdx_pt, u64 *tdx_owner, u64 *tdx_size);
> >  u64 tdh_mem_track(struct tdx_td *tdr);
> > -u64 tdh_mem_page_remove(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, u64 level, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
                                                         ^WTH, oops.
> > +u64 tdh_mem_page_remove(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, enum pg_level level, u64 *ext_err1, u64 *ext_err2);
> >  u64 tdh_phymem_cache_wb(bool resume);
> >  u64 tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_tdr(struct tdx_td *td);
> >  u64 tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_hkid(u64 hkid, struct page *page);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ