[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4784318E-D6AF-471B-A2E0-8B04EC0A238E@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:49:17 -0500
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: Jordan Niethe <jniethe@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, balbirs@...dia.com, matthew.brost@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, david@...hat.com, apopple@...dia.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, lyude@...hat.com, dakr@...nel.org,
airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch, rcampbell@...dia.com,
mpenttil@...hat.com, jgg@...dia.com, willy@...radead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, jgg@...pe.ca,
Felix.Kuehling@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] mm/page_vma_mapped: Add flags to
page_vma_mapped_walk::pfn to track device private pages
On 20 Jan 2026, at 17:37, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14/1/26 06:44, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 7 Jan 2026, at 4:18, Jordan Niethe wrote:
>>
>>> A future change will remove device private pages from the physical
>>> address space. This will mean that device private pages no longer have
>>> normal PFN and must be handled separately.
>>>
>>> Prepare for this by modifying page_vma_mapped_walk::pfn to contain flags
>>> as well as a PFN. Introduce a PVMW_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE flag to indicate
>>> that a page_vma_mapped_walk::pfn contains a PFN for a device private
>>> page.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe@...dia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> v1:
>>> - Update for HMM huge page support
>>> v2:
>>> - Move adding device_private param to check_pmd() until final patch
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/rmap.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 13 +++++++------
>>> mm/rmap.c | 4 ++--
>>> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
>>> index daa92a58585d..57c63b6a8f65 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/rmap.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
>>> @@ -939,9 +939,37 @@ struct page_vma_mapped_walk {
>>> unsigned int flags;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +/* pfn is a device private offset */
>>> +#define PVMW_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE (1UL << 0)
>>> +#define PVMW_PFN_SHIFT 1
>>> +
>>> +static inline unsigned long page_vma_walk_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>>> +{
>>> + return (pfn << PVMW_PFN_SHIFT);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline unsigned long folio_page_vma_walk_pfn(const struct folio *folio)
>>> +{
>>> + if (folio_is_device_private(folio))
>>> + return page_vma_walk_pfn(folio_pfn(folio)) |
>>> + PVMW_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE;
>>> +
>>> + return page_vma_walk_pfn(folio_pfn(folio));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline struct page *page_vma_walk_pfn_to_page(unsigned long pvmw_pfn)
>>> +{
>>> + return pfn_to_page(pvmw_pfn >> PVMW_PFN_SHIFT);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline struct folio *page_vma_walk_pfn_to_folio(unsigned long pvmw_pfn)
>>> +{
>>> + return page_folio(page_vma_walk_pfn_to_page(pvmw_pfn));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> #define DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(name, _folio, _vma, _address, _flags) \
>>> struct page_vma_mapped_walk name = { \
>>> - .pfn = folio_pfn(_folio), \
>>> + .pfn = folio_page_vma_walk_pfn(_folio), \
>>> .nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(_folio), \
>>> .pgoff = folio_pgoff(_folio), \
>>> .vma = _vma, \
>>> diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>>> index b38a1d00c971..96c525785d78 100644
>>> --- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>>> @@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ static bool check_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, unsigned long pte_nr)
>>> pfn = softleaf_to_pfn(entry);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if ((pfn + pte_nr - 1) < pvmw->pfn)
>>> + if ((pfn + pte_nr - 1) < (pvmw->pfn >> PVMW_PFN_SHIFT))
>>
>> Can you add a helper function for (pvmw->pfn >> PVMW_PFN_SHIFT)? It is impossible
>> to tell why pfn does not need >> PVMW_PFN_SHIFT.
>
> Sure, something like page_vma_walk_pfn_to_offset()?
>
Just page_vma_walk_pfn(pvmw)? Since the code is comparing with pfn.
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists