lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJRoVwiBkZj1Xor7izsWkFyCK=kXjTmqP+PU4Znz+FORghcAzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:16:21 +0100
From: Szymon Wilczek <swilczek.lx@...il.com>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, mark@...heh.com, jlbec@...lplan.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, 
	syzbot+51244a05705883616c95@...kaller.appspotmail.com, 
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix circular locking dependency in ocfs2_acquire_dquot

Hi Joseph,

You are absolutely correct. Since ocfs2_disable_quotas() completes before
ocfs2_shutdown_local_alloc(), these two specific paths likely cannot race
at runtime.

However, the Lockdep report is based on lock classes, not just runtime
concurrency.

1. The shutdown path (ocfs2_shutdown_local_alloc) teaches Lockdep:
   sb_internal -> ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key (on Local Alloc inode)

2. The acquire path (ocfs2_acquire_dquot) teaches Lockdep:
   ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key (on Quota inode) -> sb_internal

Because both inodes use the same lock class (ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key),
Lockdep sees a contradiction:
   sb_internal -> sysfile -> sb_internal

Even if they don't race, this inconsistent ordering is a violation
that Lockdep flags. Fixing the order in acquire_dquot resolves this
contradiction and ensures sb_internal (freeze protection) is always
taken outermost.

Thanks,
Szymon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ