lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260120080104.0yYtfQR7@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:01:04 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, wen.yang@...ux.dev,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 3/3] net: Allow to use SMP threads for backlog NAPI.

On 2026-01-20 07:03:58 [+0100], Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 05:30:26PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2026-01-19 08:25:34 [-0800], Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:15:46 +0800 wen.yang@...ux.dev wrote:
> > > > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> > > > 
> > > > commit dad6b97702639fba27a2bd3e986982ad6f0db3a7 upstream.
> > > > 
> > > > Backlog NAPI is a per-CPU NAPI struct only (with no device behind it)
> > > > used by drivers which don't do NAPI them self, RPS and parts of the
> > > > stack which need to avoid recursive deadlocks while processing a packet.
> > > 
> > > This is a rather large change to backport into LTS.
> > 
> > I agree. While I saw these patches flying by, I don't remember a mail
> > where it was justified why it was needed. Did I miss it?
> 
> Please see patch 0/3 in this series:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1768751557.git.wen.yang@linux.dev/

The reasoning why this is needed is due to PREEMPT_RT. This targets v6.6
and PREEMPT_RT is officially supported upstream since v6.12. For v6.6
you still need the out-of-tree patch. This means not only select the
Kconfig symbol but also a bit futex, ptrace or printk. This queue does
not include the three patches here but has another workaround having
more or less the same effect.

If this is needed only for PREEMPT_RT's sake I would suggest to route it
via the stable-rt instead and replace what is currently there.

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ