linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202601201642.SjxE1oMu-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:39:32 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

Hi Mark,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on next-20260116]
[cannot apply to brauner-vfs/vfs.all xiang-erofs/dev-test xiang-erofs/dev xiang-erofs/fixes v6.19-rc6 v6.19-rc5 v6.19-rc4 linus/master v6.19-rc6]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mark-Brown/linux-next-build-failure-after-merge-of-the-vfs-brauner-tree/20260119-223859
base:   next-20260116
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/aW5AGPFq0HPi440m%40sirena.org.uk
patch subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601201642.SjxE1oMu-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601201642.SjxE1oMu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601201642.SjxE1oMu-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> fs/ntfs3/inode.c:678:42: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 2, have 3
     678 |         iomap_read_folio(&ntfs_iomap_ops, &ctx, NULL);
         |         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                        ^~~~
   include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: note: expanded from macro 'NULL'
       8 | #define NULL ((void *)0)
         |              ^~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/iomap.h:347:6: note: 'iomap_read_folio' declared here
     347 | void iomap_read_folio(const struct iomap_ops *ops,
         |      ^                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     348 |                 struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/ntfs3/inode.c:702:41: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 2, have 3
     702 |         iomap_readahead(&ntfs_iomap_ops, &ctx, NULL);
         |         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                        ^~~~
   include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: note: expanded from macro 'NULL'
       8 | #define NULL ((void *)0)
         |              ^~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/iomap.h:349:6: note: 'iomap_readahead' declared here
     349 | void iomap_readahead(const struct iomap_ops *ops,
         |      ^               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     350 |                 struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   2 errors generated.


vim +678 fs/ntfs3/inode.c

   647	
   648	static int ntfs_read_folio(struct file *file, struct folio *folio)
   649	{
   650		int err;
   651		struct address_space *mapping = folio->mapping;
   652		struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
   653		struct ntfs_inode *ni = ntfs_i(inode);
   654		loff_t vbo = folio_pos(folio);
   655		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx ctx = {
   656			.cur_folio = folio,
   657			.ops = &ntfs_iomap_bio_read_ops,
   658		};
   659	
   660		if (unlikely(is_bad_ni(ni))) {
   661			folio_unlock(folio);
   662			return -EIO;
   663		}
   664	
   665		if (ni->i_valid <= vbo) {
   666			folio_zero_range(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
   667			folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
   668			folio_unlock(folio);
   669			return 0;
   670		}
   671	
   672		if (is_compressed(ni)) {
   673			/* ni_lock is taken inside ni_read_folio_cmpr after page locks */
   674			err = ni_read_folio_cmpr(ni, folio);
   675			return err;
   676		}
   677	
 > 678		iomap_read_folio(&ntfs_iomap_ops, &ctx, NULL);
   679		return 0;
   680	}
   681	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki