[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <088b071d1a43b403123d772f56ce033e91cb4252.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:49:05 -0800
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>, Alexei Starovoitov
<ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@...a.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Alan
Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/13] bpf: Kernel functions with
KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS
On Fri, 2026-01-16 at 12:16 -0800, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
[...]
> v1->v2:
> - Replace the following kernel functions with KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS version:
> - bpf_stream_vprintk_impl -> bpf_stream_vprintk
> - bpf_task_work_schedule_resume_impl -> bpf_task_work_schedule_resume
> - bpf_task_work_schedule_signal_impl -> bpf_task_work_schedule_signal
> - bpf_wq_set_callback_impl -> bpf_wq_set_callback_impl
Just to clarify my understanding, this is a breaking change, right?
E.g. bpf_stream_vprintk_impl is no longer in vmlinux.h and on a load
attempt an error is reported:
kfunc 'bpf_stream_vprintk_impl' is referenced but wasn't resolved
Maybe call it out explicitly in the cover letter?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists