[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1766d2ae-1224-4d3e-bc9f-786702989a79@gtucker.io>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:56:46 +0100
From: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@...cker.io>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Onur Özkan <work@...rozkan.dev>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
automated-testing@...ts.yoctoproject.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Nicolas Schier <nsc@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] scripts: introduce containerized builds
On 19/01/2026 22:49, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 02:35:16PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> I will apply this to kbuild-next-unstable shortly to give folks a week
>> or so to voice any objections or give critical review comments.
>
> During application, checkpatch.pl pointed out that this should have a
> MAINTAINERS entry. Would you be opposed to the following?
Not at all, on the contrary I have some dedicated time and long-term
interest to keep maintaining this. Please feel free to add me or I
can send an extra patch if you'd rather I did it.
> CONTAINER BUILD SCRIPT
> M: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@...cker.io>
> S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst
> F: scripts/container
>
> I will also add scripts/container to the kbuild entry. Now that I am
> looking, it looks like Nicolas has been left out of this whole thread,
> cc'ing him now (even though I assume he should have seen this through
> linux-kbuild but just in case not, the top of the thread is
> https://lore.kernel.org/cover.1767199119.git.gtucker@gtucker.io/).
OK sounds good. And sorry, get_maintainer.pl didn't mention Nicolas.
I should have checked the KERNEL BUILD entry by hand in the file...
Cheers,
Guillaume
Powered by blists - more mailing lists