[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <veqtpod2liqsi4mgcxndgaiyqlhupnymmj4pquueqziqyakmnk@fzympoan5pds>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:35:21 +0800
From: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/21] slab: remove defer_deactivate_slab()
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 03:40:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> There are no more cpu slabs so we don't need their deferred
> deactivation. The function is now only used from places where we
> allocate a new slab but then can't spin on node list_lock to put it on
> the partial list. Instead of the deferred action we can free it directly
> via __free_slab(), we just need to tell it to use _nolock() freeing of
> the underlying pages and take care of the accounting.
>
> Since free_frozen_pages_nolock() variant does not yet exist for code
> outside of the page allocator, create it as a trivial wrapper for
> __free_frozen_pages(..., FPI_TRYLOCK).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> mm/internal.h | 1 +
> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++
> mm/slab.h | 8 +-------
> mm/slub.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
--
Thanks,
Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists