[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <908b64f1-f6ac-4c5e-9c72-1174cba62017@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 11:14:12 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@....qualcomm.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: SM8750: Enable CPUFreq support
On 1/19/26 8:00 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 12/11/2025 12:32 AM, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>> Add the cpucp mailbox, sram and SCMI nodes required to enable
>> the CPUFreq support using the SCMI perf protocol on SM8750 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Just curious, does this patch enable thermal mitigation for CPU clusters
> too?
If nothing changed, we have lets-not-explode type mitigations via LMH,
but lets-not-burn-the-user would require a skin temp sensor to be
wired up, which then could be used to enable some cooling action
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists