[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260120112258.1595164-4-lihuisong@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 19:22:58 +0800
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
<zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>, <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, <yubowen8@...wei.com>,
<wangzhi12@...wei.com>, <zhangpengjie2@...wei.com>, <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI: processor: idle: Relocate and verify acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe
The platform used LPI need check if the LPI support and the entry
method is valid by the acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(). But the return
of acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe() in acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev()
isn't verified by any caller.
What's more, acpi_processor_get_power_info() is a more logical place for
verifying the validity of FFH LPI than acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev().
So move acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe() from the latter to the former and
verify its return.
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index ba4cde028b0e..4b2c740da86f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
}
/**
- * acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev - prepares and configures CPUIDLE
+ * acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev - configures CPUIDLE
* device i.e. per-cpu data
*
* @pr: the ACPI processor
@@ -1250,12 +1250,8 @@ static void acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev(struct acpi_processor *pr,
return;
dev->cpu = pr->id;
- if (pr->flags.has_lpi) {
- acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(pr->id);
- return;
- }
-
- acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(pr, dev);
+ if (!pr->flags.has_lpi)
+ acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(pr, dev);
}
static int acpi_processor_get_power_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
@@ -1264,7 +1260,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
ret = acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(pr);
if (ret)
- ret = acpi_processor_get_cstate_info(pr);
+ return acpi_processor_get_cstate_info(pr);
+
+ if (pr->flags.has_lpi) {
+ ret = acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(pr->id);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("Processor FFH LPI state is invalid.\n");
+ }
return ret;
}
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists