lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aW9qSrJ_7f9FGeqM@fedora>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:05:36 -0300
From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, 
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:RUNTIME VERIFICATION (RV)" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/26] rv/rvgen: remove redundant initial_state removal

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 09:01:01AM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-01-19 at 17:45 -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> > Remove an unnecessary and incorrect list removal operation in the
> > automata state variable processing. The code attempted to remove
> > initial_state from the states list, but this element was never
> > added to the list in the first place. States with the __init_
> > prefix are explicitly excluded from the states list during the
> > parsing loop, with only the initial_state variable being set
> > from them.
> 
> The initial state is not the state with __init_, but the state pointed to by
> that, the purpose of removing it after sorting and putting it back is for it to
> be the first (we may argue there are better ways to do that, but it works).
> 
> After this change, the initial state is duplicated..
> I think we should just drop this.

Ah, now I understood the reasoning, thanks. I will drop the patch.

> 
> Thanks,
> Gabriele
> 
> > 
> > Calling remove() on an element that does not exist in a list
> > raises a ValueError. This code would have failed during execution
> > when processing any DOT file containing an initial state marker.
> > The subsequent insert operation at index 0 correctly adds the
> > initial_state to the beginning of the states list, making the
> > removal operation both incorrect and redundant.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/automata.py | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/automata.py
> > b/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/automata.py
> > index 7841a6e70bad2..b302af3e5133e 100644
> > --- a/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/automata.py
> > +++ b/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/automata.py
> > @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ class Automata:
> >              cursor += 1
> >  
> >          states = sorted(set(states))
> > -        states.remove(initial_state)
> >  
> >          # Insert the initial state at the beginning of the states
> >          states.insert(0, initial_state)
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ