[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260121073547-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 07:35:53 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Asias He <asias@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 0/4] vsock/virtio: fix TX credit handling
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:36:24AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> The original series was posted by Melbin K Mathew <mlbnkm1@...il.com> till v4.
> Since it's a real issue and the original author seems busy, I'm sending
> the new version fixing my comments but keeping the authorship (and restoring
> mine on patch 2 as reported on v4).
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> v6:
> - Rebased on net tree since there was a conflict on patch 4 with another
> test added.
> - No code changes.
>
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260116201517.273302-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251217181206.3681159-1-mlbnkm1@gmail.com/
>
> >From Melbin K Mathew <mlbnkm1@...il.com>:
>
> This series fixes TX credit handling in virtio-vsock:
>
> Patch 1: Fix potential underflow in get_credit() using s64 arithmetic
> Patch 2: Fix vsock_test seqpacket bounds test
> Patch 3: Cap TX credit to local buffer size (security hardening)
> Patch 4: Add stream TX credit bounds regression test
>
> The core issue is that a malicious guest can advertise a huge buffer
> size via SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE, causing the host to allocate
> excessive sk_buff memory when sending data to that guest.
>
> On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with
> 32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly
> drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB; the system only
> recovered after killing the QEMU process.
>
> With this series applied, the same PoC shows only ~35 MiB increase in
> Slab/SUnreclaim, no host OOM, and the guest remains responsive.
>
> Melbin K Mathew (3):
> vsock/virtio: fix potential underflow in virtio_transport_get_credit()
> vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size
> vsock/test: add stream TX credit bounds test
>
> Stefano Garzarella (1):
> vsock/test: fix seqpacket message bounds test
>
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 30 +++++--
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists