lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFppNgYvHJDqfvyQ0DTYCwgcSR12D+-=04NGEDtbM8FmTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 13:44:04 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, abel.vesa@...aro.org, 
	ebiggers@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable ICE for CQE-capable controllers
 with non-CQE cards

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 at 07:43, Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Enable Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) support for CQE-capable sdhci-msm
> controllers when used with eMMC cards that do not support CQE.
>
> This addresses the scenario where:
> - The host controller supports CQE (and has CQHCI crypto infrastructure)
> - The eMMC card does not support CQE
> - Standard (non-CMDQ) requests need crypto support
>
> This allows hardware-accelerated encryption and decryption for standard
> requests on CQE-capable hardware by utilizing the existing CQHCI crypto
> register space even when CQE functionality is not available due to card
> limitations.
>
> The implementation:
> - Adds ICE register definitions for non-CQE crypto configuration
> - Implements per-request crypto setup via sdhci_msm_ice_cfg()
> - Hooks into the request path via mmc_host_ops.request for non-CQE requests
> - Uses CQHCI register space (NONCQ_CRYPTO_PARM/DUN) for crypto configuration
>
> With this, CQE-capable controllers can benefit from inline encryption
> when paired with non-CQE cards, improving performance for encrypted I/O
> while maintaining compatibility with existing CQE crypto support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>

This has been applied for next since a few weeks, but I have a
question. See more below.

[...]

>
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 3b85233131b3..da356627d9de 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,17 @@
>  #define CQHCI_VENDOR_CFG1      0xA00
>  #define CQHCI_VENDOR_DIS_RST_ON_CQ_EN  (0x3 << 13)
>
> +/* non command queue crypto enable register*/
> +#define NONCQ_CRYPTO_PARM              0x70
> +#define NONCQ_CRYPTO_DUN               0x74
> +
> +#define DISABLE_CRYPTO                 BIT(15)
> +#define CRYPTO_GENERAL_ENABLE          BIT(1)
> +#define HC_VENDOR_SPECIFIC_FUNC4       0x260
> +
> +#define ICE_HCI_PARAM_CCI      GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define ICE_HCI_PARAM_CE       GENMASK(8, 8)
> +
>  struct sdhci_msm_offset {
>         u32 core_hc_mode;
>         u32 core_mci_data_cnt;
> @@ -300,6 +311,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
>         u32 dll_config;
>         u32 ddr_config;
>         bool vqmmc_enabled;
> +       bool non_cqe_ice_init_done;
>  };
>
>  static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -2012,6 +2024,68 @@ static int sdhci_msm_ice_keyslot_evict(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
>         return qcom_ice_evict_key(msm_host->ice, slot);
>  }
>
> +static void sdhci_msm_non_cqe_ice_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +       struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +       struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +       struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc;
> +       struct cqhci_host *cq_host = mmc->cqe_private;
> +       u32 config;
> +
> +       config = sdhci_readl(host, HC_VENDOR_SPECIFIC_FUNC4);
> +       config &= ~DISABLE_CRYPTO;
> +       sdhci_writel(host, config, HC_VENDOR_SPECIFIC_FUNC4);
> +       config = cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CFG);
> +       config |= CRYPTO_GENERAL_ENABLE;
> +       cqhci_writel(cq_host, config, CQHCI_CFG);
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_msm_ice_cfg(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +{
> +       struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +       struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +       struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc;
> +       struct cqhci_host *cq_host = mmc->cqe_private;
> +       unsigned int crypto_params = 0;
> +       int key_index;
> +
> +       if (mrq->crypto_ctx) {
> +               if (!msm_host->non_cqe_ice_init_done) {
> +                       sdhci_msm_non_cqe_ice_init(host);
> +                       msm_host->non_cqe_ice_init_done = true;
> +               }
> +
> +               key_index = mrq->crypto_key_slot;
> +               crypto_params = FIELD_PREP(ICE_HCI_PARAM_CE, 1) |
> +                               FIELD_PREP(ICE_HCI_PARAM_CCI, key_index);
> +
> +               cqhci_writel(cq_host, crypto_params, NONCQ_CRYPTO_PARM);
> +               cqhci_writel(cq_host, lower_32_bits(mrq->crypto_ctx->bc_dun[0]),
> +                            NONCQ_CRYPTO_DUN);
> +       } else {
> +               cqhci_writel(cq_host, crypto_params, NONCQ_CRYPTO_PARM);

Should we really call cqhci_writel() here, even if
sdhci_msm_non_cqe_ice_init() has not been called yet?

> +       }
> +
> +       /* Ensure crypto configuration is written before proceeding */
> +       wmb();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Handle non-CQE MMC requests with ICE crypto support.
> + * Configures ICE registers before passing the request to
> + * the standard SDHCI handler.
> + */
> +static void sdhci_msm_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +{
> +       struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> +
> +       /* Only need to handle non-CQE crypto requests in this path */
> +       if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO)
> +               sdhci_msm_ice_cfg(host, mrq);
> +
> +       sdhci_request(mmc, mrq);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct blk_crypto_ll_ops sdhci_msm_crypto_ops = {
>         .keyslot_program        = sdhci_msm_ice_keyslot_program,
>         .keyslot_evict          = sdhci_msm_ice_keyslot_evict,
> @@ -2762,6 +2836,9 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY | MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO
> +       host->mmc_host_ops.request = sdhci_msm_request;
> +#endif
>         /* Set the timeout value to max possible */
>         host->max_timeout_count = 0xF;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Kind regards
Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ