[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260121133146.GY961572@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:31:46 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@...zbot.org>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] vfio: Wait for dma-buf invalidation to complete
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> On 1/20/26 15:07, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> >
> > dma-buf invalidation is performed asynchronously by hardware, so VFIO must
> > wait until all affected objects have been fully invalidated.
> >
> > Fixes: 5d74781ebc86 ("vfio/pci: Add dma-buf export support for MMIO regions")
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
>
> Please also keep in mind that the while this wait for all fences for
> correctness you also need to keep the mapping valid until
> dma_buf_unmap_attachment() was called.
Can you elaborate on this more?
I think what we want for dma_buf_attach_revocable() is the strong
guarentee that the importer stops doing all access to the memory once
this sequence is completed and the exporter can rely on it. I don't
think this works any other way.
This is already true for dynamic move capable importers, right?
For the non-revocable importers I can see the invalidate sequence is
more of an advisory thing and you can't know the access is gone until
the map is undone.
> In other words you can only redirect the DMA-addresses previously
> given out into nirvana (or a dummy memory or similar), but you still
> need to avoid re-using them for something else.
Does any driver do this? If you unload/reload a GPU driver it is
going to re-use the addresses handed out?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists