[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17e6bdc4-a38a-4486-a92b-bf9a1f9a4f8a@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:30:20 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Karol Gugala <kgugala@...micro.com>,
Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@...micro.com>,
Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@...il.com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>, Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: ethernet: litex: use device pointer
to simplify code.
> - netdev->tstats = devm_netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(&pdev->dev,
> - struct pcpu_sw_netstats);
> + netdev->tstats = devm_netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(dev, struct pcpu_sw_netstats);
Is that longer than 80 characters? netdev keeps with the lower limit.
Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists