linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document qcs8300 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <wfkjfoaqgn7lyhtiojodjcaxyzsi75zszoxpd3o47p5i6l2eb7@gxmozuc2wh47>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:00:46 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Nihal Kumar Gupta <quic_nihalkum@...cinc.com>
Cc: bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, 
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, 
	hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, catalin.marinas@....com, 
	will@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, quic_svankada@...cinc.com, 
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document qcs8300
 compatible

On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 03:29:10PM +0530, Nihal Kumar Gupta wrote:
> The three instances of CCI found on the QCS8300 are functionally the same
> as on a number of existing Qualcomm SoCs.
> 
> Introduce a new SoC-specific compatible string "qcom,qcs8300-cci" with a
> common fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nihal Kumar Gupta <quic_nihalkum@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>

Maybe I'm not seeing it, but you didn't include either i2c maintainers
or the linux-i2c mailing list, so this is unlikely to move anywhere.

Please send this out again with the recipients that get_maintainers tell
you do include. (and skip the ones that aren't relevant).

And please adopt b4 (go/upstream tells you how) to avoid such (human)
mistakes going forward.

Thanks,
Bjorn

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
> index a3fe1eea6aec..399a09409e07 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties:
>            - enum:
>                - qcom,kaanapali-cci
>                - qcom,qcm2290-cci
> +              - qcom,qcs8300-cci
>                - qcom,sa8775p-cci
>                - qcom,sc7280-cci
>                - qcom,sc8280xp-cci
> @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ allOf:
>              enum:
>                - qcom,kaanapali-cci
>                - qcom,qcm2290-cci
> +              - qcom,qcs8300-cci
>                - qcom,sm8750-cci
>      then:
>        properties:
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>