lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c17d4413-1ffa-4d3e-8d87-0e7c2b022c16@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:22:08 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
 Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/21] slab: remove SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL

On 1/20/26 23:25, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 2:40 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>>
>> We have removed the partial slab usage from allocation paths. Now remove
>> the whole config option and associated code.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> 
> I did?

Hmm looks like you didn't. Wonder if I screwed up, or b4 did. Sorry about that.

> Well, if so, I missed some remaining mentions about cpu partial caches:
> - slub.c has several hits on "cpu partial" in the comments.
> - there is one hit on "put_cpu_partial" in slub.c in the comments.

Should be addressed later by [PATCH v3 18/21] slab: update overview
comments. I'll grep the result if anything is missing.

> Should we also update Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab to
> say that from now on cpu_partial control always reads 0?

Uh those weird files. Does anyone care? I'd do that separately as well...

> Once addressed, please feel free to keep my Reviewed-by.

Thanks!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ