[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXDkzHygHZasufg9@tiehlicka>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:38:04 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>, steve.kang@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: bail out when meet the goal of proactive memcg
reclaim
On Wed 21-01-26 17:06:20, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
> From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
>
> The proactive memcg reclaim defines the specific target mem cgroup
> as well as a certain number of memories, which is different to
> the kswapd and direct reclaim that need to keep the fairness among
> cgroups. This commit would like to introduce a criteria to have
> proactive reclaim bail out when target mem cgroup could meet the goal
> via its own lruvec, which means the reclaim would also go through the
> whole tree if the iter start on the desendants.
Could you describe the actual problem you are trying to deal with?
I would be also interested why the limit aplies only to target_memcg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 670fe9fae5ba..5dcca4559b18 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -6028,8 +6028,15 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
> sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
> sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
>
> - /* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
> - if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
> + /* If partial walks are allowed, or proactive reclaim where
> + * the target memcg is clearly defined that could let us ignore
> + * the fairness thing, bail once goal is reached.
> + * note: for proactive reclaim, the criteria make sense only
> + * when target_memcg has both of descendant groups and folios
> + * charged. Other wise, walk the whole tree under target_memcg.
> + */
> + if ((partial || (sc->proactive && target_memcg == memcg)) &&
> + sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
> mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists