[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a814aef-7b81-4b9d-a0a5-39f7dd7daf3d@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:29:53 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/21] slab: remove struct kmem_cache_cpu
On 1/20/26 13:40, Hao Li wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 03:40:35PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> @@ -3853,7 +3632,7 @@ static bool has_pcs_used(int cpu, struct kmem_cache *s)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * Flush cpu slab.
>> + * Flush percpu sheaves
>> *
>> * Called from CPU work handler with migration disabled.
>> */
>> @@ -3868,8 +3647,6 @@ static void flush_cpu_slab(struct work_struct *w)
>
> Nit: Would it make sense to rename flush_cpu_slab to flush_cpu_sheaf for better
> clarity?
OK
> Other than that, looks good to me. Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists