[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f51d55fd-c8d5-4769-a5e8-354cec9c1cb4@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 22:45:01 +0800
From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
CC: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman
<mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Shrikanth Hegde
<sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>, "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>, "Ingo
Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, "Vincent
Guittot" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] sched/topology: Compute sd_weight considering
cpuset partitions
On 1/20/2026 7:32 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> The "sd_weight" used for calculating the load balancing interval, and
> its limits, considers the span weight of the entire topology level
> without accounting for cpuset partitions.
>
> Compute the "sd_weight" after computing the "sd_span" considering the
> cpu_map covered by the partition, and set the load balancing interval,
> and its limits accordingly.
>
> Fixes: cb83b629bae03 ("sched/numa: Rewrite the CONFIG_NUMA sched domain support")
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
> ---
This not only fixes the issue for periodic load balancer
but also nohz balance because it gives a correct value for nr_busy_cpus
so from my understanding,
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
thanks,
Chenyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists